中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 126-133.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.018

• 公共安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

贵州少数民族村寨火灾风险综合评价

孙威1, 韦善阳1 副教授, 田筱2, 许石青1 高级实验员, 石美1   

  1. 1 贵州大学 矿业学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;
    2 贵州航空职业技术学院 航空机电分院,贵州 贵阳 550006
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-18 修回日期:2020-09-12 出版日期:2020-10-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
  • 作者简介:孙 威 (1995—),男,贵州安顺人,硕士研究生,研究方向为消防工程。E-mail: 798490047@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合支撑[2019]2889号)。

Comprehensive fire risk assessment of Guizhou minority villages

SUN Wei1, WEI Shanyang1, TIAN Xiao2, XU Shiqing1, SHI Mei1   

  1. 1 School of Mining, Guizhou University, Guiyang Guizhou 550025, China;
    2 Aviation Electromechanical Department, Guizhou Vocational College of Aviation, Guiyang Guizhou 550025, China
  • Received:2020-07-18 Revised:2020-09-12 Online:2020-10-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要: 为解决少数民族村寨火灾隐患大、预防扑救困难的问题,采用层次分析法(AHP)对贵州某代表性少数民族村寨建立层级火灾风险评价模型;运用解释结构模型(ISM)获得各指标之间的影响关系,使用网络层次分析法(ANP)确定指标权重;引入灰色关联分析法确定环境影响因素关联度,应用物元可拓模型得到少数民族村寨火灾危险等级。结果表明:评价指标权重最大的是火灾荷载密度,占比11.8%;最小的是消防站等级,占比0.4%;经评价达到最安全等级即第4级的指标有10个,占比32.2%;达到最危险等级即第1级的指标有5个,占比15.41%。综合评价得出少数民族村寨的综合危险等级为3级,火灾风险较低。

关键词: 少数民族村寨, 火灾风险评价, 层次分析法(AHP), 解释结构模型(ISM), 网络层次分析法(ANP), 物元可拓模型

Abstract: In order to solve great fire hazards and difficulties in fire prevention and rescue in ethnic minority villages, a hierarchical fire risk assessment model was established for a representative village in Guizhou by using AHP. Then, impact relationship between various indicators was obtained through ISM, and index weights were determined by ANP. Finally, grey relational analysis was introduced to determine relevance degree of environmental influence factors before fire hazard levels in such villages were acquired by applying matter-element extension model. The results show that the largest evaluation index weight is fire load density, accounting for 11.8% while the smallest is fire station grade, accounting for 0.4%. After evaluation, 10 indexes reaches safest level, namely level four, making up for 32.2%, and 5 indexes reaches the most dangerous level, namely level one for 15.41%. The comprehensive risk level of these minority villages is level 3, which is comparatively low.

Key words: ethnic minority villages, fire risk assessment, analytic hierarchy process(AHP), interpretive structural modeling(ISM), analytic network process(ANP), matter-element extension model

中图分类号: